DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 1996 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
CarismaModelVectra
1997Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
180 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
137 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4495 mm
1710 mmWidth1707 mm
1405 mmHeight1425 mm
1080 KgWeight1260 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mitsubishi Carisma and 1996 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…