DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mitsubishi Attrage vs 2014 Audi A1 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A1

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
AttrageModelA1
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

13,3 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
174 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1193 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
80 HPPower86 HP
106 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
CVTTransmission—
15Tyre size215/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4245 mmLength3954 mm
1670 mmWidth1740 mm
1515 mmHeight1416 mm
930 kgWeight1115 Kg
450 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2469 mm

Additional Features

Mitsubishi AttrageDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth
Audi A1

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mitsubishi Attrage and 2014 Audi A1 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A1 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…