DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2014 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGreat Wall
ASXModelCowry
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
360 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4574 mm
1770 mmWidth1704 mm
1625-1635 mmHeight1845 mm
1545 KgWeight1510 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mitsubishi ASX and 2014 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…