DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2017 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
ASXModelCX-5
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
190 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
150 HPPower194 HP
360 NmTorque258 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/55 R18Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4550 mm
1810 mmWidth1840 mm
1640 mmHeight1680 mm
1520 KgWeight1590 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi ASX and 2017 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…