DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2015 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
ASXModelRanger
2015Model year2015
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
190 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
147 HPPower166 HP
360 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60 R17 96HTyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength5359 mm
1770 mmWidth1850 mm
1615 mmHeight1815 mm
1520 KgWeight2048 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mitsubishi ASX and 2015 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…