DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A6 vs 2014 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 20.5 points.

77.75–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeVolkswagen
A6ModelCaddy
2016Model year2014
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
226 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
190 HPPower105 HP
320 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4943 mmLength4406 mm
1874 mmWidth1794 mm
1461-1482 mmHeight1823 mm
1600 KgWeight1388 Kg
2912 mmWheelbase2681 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A6 and 2014 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 20.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…