DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 SsangYong Kyron Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSsangYong
ASXModelKyron
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2299 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
197 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4660 mm
1770 mmWidth1880 mm
1625 mmHeight1755 mm
1360 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 SsangYong Kyron approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…