DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2016 Audi Q2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
ASXModelQ2
2015Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,7 s
200 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
300 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4191 mm
1770 mmWidth1794 mm
1625 mmHeight1508 mm
1460 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mitsubishi ASX and 2016 Audi Q2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…