DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2013 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.75–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
ASXModelClio
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

200 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
150 HPPower200 HP
300 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4062 mm
1770 mmWidth1732 mm
1625 mmHeight1448 mm
1460 KgWeight1204 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mitsubishi ASX and 2013 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…