DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2011 Audi A4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
ASXModelA4
2012Model year2011
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,7 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
300 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4721 mm
1770 mmWidth1841 mm
1625 mmHeight1495 mm
1460 KgWeight1705 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2011 Audi A4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…