DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
ASXModelA3
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
200 km/hTop speed216 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
300 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4237 mm
1770 mmWidth1777 mm
1625 mmHeight1421 mm
1460 KgWeight1280 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…