DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
ASXModelC3
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
189 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
114 HPPower112 HP
300 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank48 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17 96HTyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength3941 mm
1770 mmWidth1728 mm
1615 mmHeight1524 mm
1440 KgWeight1090 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…