DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2013 Chevrolet Trax Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChevrolet
ASXModelTrax
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,6 s
186 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
140 HPPower130 HP
177 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank52 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
CVTGears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4248 mm
1770 mmWidth1776 mm
1625 mmHeight1674 mm
1390 KgWeight1384 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2555 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mitsubishi ASX and 2013 Chevrolet Trax approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…