DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2013 Kia Pro Cee'd Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeKia
ASXModelPro Cee'd
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
183 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1582 cc
115 HPPower90 HP
154 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank53 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/65 R16 98H; 215/60R17 96HTyre size185/65 R15; 195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4250 mm
1770 mmWidth1790 mm
1615 mmHeight1450 mm
1275 KgWeight1358 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mitsubishi ASX and 2013 Kia Pro Cee'd approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…