DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
ASXModel2
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
183 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
115 HPPower95 HP
154 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank43 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16 98H; 215/60R17 96HTyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength3920 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1615 mmHeight1475 mm
1275 KgWeight1025 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…