DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2018 Citroen C4 Cactus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C4 Cactus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 13 points.

57.25–70.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
ASXModelC4 Cactus
2012Model year2018
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
183 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
115 HPPower100 HP
154 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption4,7 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,2 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
5Gears6
—TransmissionAT
215/65 R16 98H; 215/60R17 96HTyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4170 mm
1770 mmWidth1710 mm
1615 mmHeight1480 mm
1275 KgWeight1155 kg
—Luggage capacity353 lt
2670 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Citroen C4 CactusDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2018 Citroen C4 Cactus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C4 Cactus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 13 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…