DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
AirtrekModelFocus
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,9 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
139 HPPower153 HP
207 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4410 mmLength4450 mm
1750 mmWidth1699 mm
1550 mmHeight1430 mm
1450 KgWeight1280 Kg
2626 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…