2015 • Mini
Paceman
Mini Paceman 2.0 (143 Hp) 2015Overall Score69.75/100
2015 Mini Paceman vs 2015 Mazda CX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Mazda
CX-3
Mazda CX-3 2.0i (150 Hp) 2015Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mini PacemanSpecificationMazda CX-3
MiniMakeMazda
PacemanModelCX-3
2015Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Mini PacemanSpecificationMazda CX-3
9,1 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
202 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
305 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mini PacemanSpecificationMazda CX-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank44 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mini PacemanSpecificationMazda CX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mini PacemanSpecificationMazda CX-3
4114 mmLength4275 mm
1786 mmWidth1765 mm
1518 mmHeight1535 mm
1320 KgWeight1235 Kg
2596 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Mini Paceman and 2015 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…