2017 • Mini
Hatch
Mini Hatch 2.0 (170 Hp) 2017Overall Score72.75/100
2017 Mini Hatch vs 2017 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 Power 2017 2.0 160 HPOverall Score73.25/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
72.75–73.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mini HatchSpecificationMazda CX-5
MiniMakeMazda
HatchModelCX-5
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mini HatchSpecificationMazda CX-5
7,4 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
225 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
170 HPPower160 HP
360 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mini HatchSpecificationMazda CX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank58 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mini HatchSpecificationMazda CX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—TransmissionAT
195/55 R16 87WTyre size19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mini HatchSpecificationMazda CX-5
4005 mmLength4555 mm
1727 mmWidth1840 mm
1425 mmHeight1670 mm
1230 KgWeight1460 kg
—Luggage capacity503 lt
2567 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Mini Hatch and 2017 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…