DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mini Hatch vs 2009 Mazda Axela Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Axela

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMazda
HatchModelAxela
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
120 HPPower114 HP
160 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
175/65 R15 HTyre size195/65R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3699 mmLength4405 mm
1683 mmWidth1745 mm
1407 mmHeight1465 mm
1065 KgWeight1240 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mini Hatch and 2009 Mazda Axela approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Axela leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…