DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mini Hatch vs 2009 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFiat
HatchModelBravo
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
203 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank57 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R15 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3699 mmLength4336 mm
1683 mmWidth1792 mm
1407 mmHeight1498 mm
1065 KgWeight1260 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mini Hatch and 2009 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…