DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Hatch vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Hatch

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mini HatchSpecificationVolvo C30
MiniMakeVolvo
HatchModelC30
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
4Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

Mini HatchSpecificationVolvo C30
7,0 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
228 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
184 HPPower177 HP
240 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mini HatchSpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mini HatchSpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R16 87VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mini HatchSpecificationVolvo C30
3729 mmLength4266 mm
1683 mmWidth1782 mm
1407 mmHeight1447 mm
1140 KgWeight1451 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Hatch and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Hatch leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…