DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Countryman vs 2012 Peugeot Partner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot Partner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakePeugeot
CountrymanModelPartner
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4/5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
173 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
98 HPPower110 HP
153 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16 92HTyre size205/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4097 mmLength4380 mm
1789 mmWidth1810 mm
1561 mmHeight1803 mm
1265 KgWeight1472 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2728 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Countryman and 2012 Peugeot Partner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot Partner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…