DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Countryman vs 2012 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fusion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFord
CountrymanModelFusion
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
173 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower101 HP
153 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16 92HTyre size195/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4097 mmLength4013 mm
1789 mmWidth1724 mm
1561 mmHeight1543 mm
1265 KgWeight1090 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2486 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Countryman and 2012 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…