DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mini Countryman vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeVolvo
CountrymanModelC30
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
4/5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
122 HPPower114 HP
160 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank52 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16 92HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4097 mmLength4266 mm
1789 mmWidth1782 mm
1561 mmHeight1447 mm
1265 KgWeight1354 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mini Countryman and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…