DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mini Countryman vs 2013 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeHonda
CountrymanModelFIT
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
112 HPPower110 HP
270 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
47 ltFuel tank32 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
205/60 R16 92HTyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4097 mmLength3955 mm
1789 mmWidth1695 mm
1561 mmHeight1525 mm
1310 KgWeight1080 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mini Countryman and 2013 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…