DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mini Countryman vs 2017 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeHonda
CountrymanModelFIT
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
136 HPPower132 HP
220 NmTorque155 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/65 R16Tyre size185/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength3955 mm
1822 mmWidth1695 mm
1557 mmHeight1525 mm
1455 KgWeight1050 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mini Countryman and 2017 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…