DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mini Convertible vs 2014 Great Wall Steed Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Steed

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeGreat Wall
ConvertibleModelSteed
2015Model year2014
CabrioletBody typePick-up
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
112 HPPower106 HP
270 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3723 mmLength5040 mm
1683 mmWidth1800 mm
1414 mmHeight1730 mm
1225 KgWeight1565 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase3050 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mini Convertible and 2014 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Steed leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…