DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mini Convertible vs 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeSuzuki
ConvertibleModelGrand Vitara
2005Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
116 HPPower107 HP
150 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank56 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption12 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
175/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3635 mmLength4090 mm
1688 mmWidth1700 mm
1415 mmHeight1690 mm
1250 KgWeight1270 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mini Convertible and 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…