DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Convertible vs 2012 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fusion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFord
ConvertibleModelFusion
2012Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
181 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower101 HP
153 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size195/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

3723 mmLength4013 mm
1683 mmWidth1724 mm
1414 mmHeight1543 mm
1160 KgWeight1090 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2486 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Convertible and 2012 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…