DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mini Convertible vs 2009 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeVolkswagen
ConvertibleModelPolo
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
182 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
211 HPPower180 HP
260 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R17 84WTyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3714 mmLength3897 mm
1683 mmWidth1650 mm
1414 mmHeight1465 mm
1230 KgWeight1095 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mini Convertible and 2009 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…