DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mini Convertible vs 2006 Mazda RX-8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMazda
ConvertibleModelRX-8
2009Model year2006
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors4

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
182 km/hTop speed223 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1308 cc
211 HPPower192 HP
260 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R17 84WTyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3714 mmLength4435 mm
1683 mmWidth1770 mm
1414 mmHeight1340 mm
1230 KgWeight1330 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mini Convertible and 2006 Mazda RX-8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…