DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mini Convertible vs 2009 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFiat
ConvertibleModelBravo
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
182 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
211 HPPower150 HP
260 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank57 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/45 R17 84WTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3714 mmLength4336 mm
1683 mmWidth1792 mm
1414 mmHeight1498 mm
1230 KgWeight1275 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mini Convertible and 2009 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…