DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mini Convertible vs 2015 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFord
ConvertibleModelFigo
2015Model year2015
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
122 HPPower112 HP
160 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R15 84HTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3723 mmLength3995 mm
1683 mmWidth1695 mm
1414 mmHeight1525 mm
1165 KgWeight—
2467 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mini Convertible and 2015 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…