DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mini Convertible vs 2010 Suzuki Swift Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeSuzuki
ConvertibleModelSwift
2010Model year2010
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
198 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1586 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption9,0 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size195/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3699 mmLength3765 mm
1683 mmWidth1690 mm
1414 mmHeight1500 mm
1165 KgWeight1105 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2380 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mini Convertible and 2010 Suzuki Swift approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…