DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Cadillac DE Ville Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeCadillac
ZTModelDE Ville
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,5 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
250 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4565 cc
260 HPPower279 HP
410 NmTorque407 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
10,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
13,2 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/40 R18; 275/35 R18Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength5258 mm
1780 mmWidth1890 mm
1430 mmHeight1440 mm
1595 KgWeight1840 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2929 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Cadillac DE Ville approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…