DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Grand Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

82.5–82.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeJeep
ZTModelGrand Cherokee
2003Model year2005
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

6,5 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed201 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
260 HPPower238 HP
410 NmTorque414 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank78 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption—
10,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/40 R18; 275/35 R18Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4740 mm
1780 mmWidth1862 mm
1430 mmHeight1720 mm
1595 KgWeight2092 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Grand Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…