DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZT vs 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler PT Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeChrysler
ZTModelPT Cruiser
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
227 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
190 HPPower182 HP
245 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank57 lt
14,3 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/45 R18Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4290 mm
1780 mmWidth1705 mm
1410 mmHeight1600 mm
1485 KgWeight1450 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2616 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZT and 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler PT Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…