DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 MG ZT vs 2004 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeVolkswagen
ZTModelPassat
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
215 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
177 HPPower180 HP
240 NmTorque370 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank62 lt
16 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/45 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4703 mm
1780 mmWidth1746 mm
1410 mmHeight1462 mm
1510 KgWeight1625 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 MG ZT and 2004 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…