DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 MG ZT vs 2004 Hyundai Dynasty Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Dynasty

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeHyundai
ZTModelDynasty
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
177 HPPower173 HP
240 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
16 ltUrban consumption15 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/45 R18Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4980 mm
1780 mmWidth1810 mm
1410 mmHeight1440 mm
1510 KgWeight1645 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 MG ZT and 2004 Hyundai Dynasty approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Dynasty leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…