DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZT vs 2002 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationOpel Omega
MGMakeOpel
ZTModelOmega
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationOpel Omega
9,4 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
215 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
177 HPPower150 HP
240 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
16 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/45 R18Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationOpel Omega
4740 mmLength4898 mm
1780 mmWidth1775 mm
1410 mmHeight1450 mm
1510 KgWeight1610 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZT and 2002 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…