DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZT vs 2002 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationJeep Cherokee
MGMakeJeep
ZTModelCherokee
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationJeep Cherokee
9,4 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
177 HPPower147 HP
240 NmTorque215 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationJeep Cherokee
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
16 ltUrban consumption16,4 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationJeep Cherokee
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/45 R18Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationJeep Cherokee
4740 mmLength4496 mm
1780 mmWidth1819 mm
1410 mmHeight1866 mm
1510 KgWeight1803 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZT and 2002 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…