DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Chevrolet Evanda Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeChevrolet
ZSModelEvanda
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower131 HP
260 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4770 mm
1700 mmWidth1815 mm
1390 mmHeight1440 mm
1225 KgWeight1422 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Chevrolet Evanda approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…