DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Opel Signum Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Signum
MGMakeOpel
ZSModelSignum
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Signum
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
193 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
113 HPPower125 HP
260 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Signum
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
—Average consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Signum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Signum
4520 mmLength4636 mm
1700 mmWidth1798 mm
1390 mmHeight1460 mm
1225 KgWeight1610 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Opel Signum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…