DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Great Wall Pegasus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeGreat Wall
ZSModelPegasus
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
113 HPPower105 HP
260 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4820 mm
1700 mmWidth1870 mm
1390 mmHeight1700 mm
1225 KgWeight1625 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Great Wall Pegasus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…