DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 MG ZS vs 2006 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
MGMakeCitroen
ZSModelC4
2005Model year2006
SedanBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
9,0 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
19 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1749 cc
117 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
4520 mmLength4590 mm
1700 mmWidth1830 mm
1390 mmHeight1660-1710 mm
1125 KgWeight1510 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2728 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 MG ZS and 2006 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…