DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 MG ZS vs 2005 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C3
MGMakeCitroen
ZSModelC3
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C3
9,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
19 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
117 HPPower90 HP
160 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size175/65 R14; 185/60 R15; 195/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C3
4520 mmLength3860 mm
1700 mmWidth1667 mm
1390 mmHeight1510 mm
1125 KgWeight1088 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 MG ZS and 2005 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…