DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Brilliance M1 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M1

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationBrilliance M1
MGMakeBrilliance
ZSModelM1
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationBrilliance M1
9,0 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
19 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
117 HPPower129 HP
160 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationBrilliance M1
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank74 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationBrilliance M1
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationBrilliance M1
4520 mmLength4880 mm
1700 mmWidth1800 mm
1390 mmHeight1450 mm
1125 KgWeight1420 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Brilliance M1 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M1 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…