DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeSuzuki
ZSModelGrand Vitara
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
19 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
117 HPPower128 HP
160 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank56 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength3865 mm
1700 mmWidth1710 mm
1390 mmHeight1690 mm
1125 KgWeight1290 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…