DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Peugeot 206 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 206

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationPeugeot 206
MGMakePeugeot
ZSModel206
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationPeugeot 206
9,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
19 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
117 HPPower109 HP
160 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationPeugeot 206
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationPeugeot 206
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/55 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationPeugeot 206
4520 mmLength3822 mm
1700 mmWidth1652 mm
1390 mmHeight1425 mm
1125 KgWeight1013 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2442 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Peugeot 206 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 206 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…